Lenovo 3209C54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive99.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 3209C54  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120807
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJul 10 '23 at 12:47
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$183
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 168
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 410
42% 341 Pts
64-Core 429
27% 429 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 27
Parallax 20.9
12% 21 fps
MRender 25.6
Gravity 16.5
Splatting 21.4
17% 21.2 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-512-G2 512GB
309GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN07181
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 409 399 422 427 430 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 467
Mixed 428
SusWrite 418
100% 441 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 40.4
142% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 286
213% 280 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 103%
SSDPR-CX400-01T-G2 1TB
331GB free
Firmware: SBFMLB.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 176 136 138 139 96 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63% Good
Read 211
Write 106
Mixed 138
SusWrite 178
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 32
114% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 196
146% 191 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron DVM64453C DATARAM 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.7% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 15.1
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3209C54 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3209C54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback