MSI MS-16GC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GE60 2OC\2OD\2OE
MotherboardMSI MS-16GC  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '17 at 19:50
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 82.9
2-Core 181
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 506
48% 395 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 71%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 765M
MSI(1462 10E0) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 15.1
Parallax 19.5
14% 17.1 fps
MRender 17.2
Gravity 20
Splatting 14.6
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 120GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 566
Write 155
Mixed 205
67% 309 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 5.63
64% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 28.4
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 3.26
30% 64.5 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 94%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
371GB free
Firmware: AM001J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 95.6
Write 105
Mixed 91.2
73% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.19
70% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2S4G64CC88B4N-DI 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
31% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 8.5
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16GC Builds (Compare 235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16GC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback