Asrock H410M-HDV/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 196%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 178%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics225% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive328% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H410M-HDV/M.2  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '23 at 12:04
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600-$137
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 134
2-Core 252
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 805
78% 640 Pts
64-Core 962
60% 962 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
MSI(1462 3882) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Lighting 340
Reflection 303
Parallax 347
277% 330 fps
MRender 369
Gravity 265
Splatting 191
215% 275 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 225%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRS1000G 1TB
552GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2133 2086 2133 1653 1603 1478 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 1,940
Write 2,389
Mixed 2,132
SusWrite 1,848
470% 2,077 MB/s
4K Read 58
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 95.8
301% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,135
DQ Write 810
DQ Mixed 990
735% 978 MB/s
Poor: 247%
This bench: 328%
Great: 573%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
167GB free
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 228 234 227 230 233 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 456
Write 253
Mixed 254
SusWrite 229
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 98.6
4K Mixed 15.2
106% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 23
45% 90.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 74%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
89GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 438 440 434 290 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 475
Mixed 398
SusWrite 369
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 63.6
210% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 124%
Great: 134%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$34
602GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 112 113 113 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 108
Write 107
Mixed 100
SusWrite 112
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 76%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
293GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 9.7 8.8 9.5 9.2 8.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 29% Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.4% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 19.7
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 20.4
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H410M-HDV/M.2 Builds (Compare 667 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock H410M-HDV/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $368
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback