Asus G701VO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus G701VO  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G701VO
Memory57.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '23 at 21:12
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 109
2-Core 205
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 557
56% 455 Pts
64-Core 536
33% 536 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980
Asus(1043 12B0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1652 MHz, MLim: 1837 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56% Above average
Lighting 69.8
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 68.3
57% 48.4 fps
MRender 74.9
Gravity 65.4
Splatting 60.9
54% 67.1 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 821 773 803 771 802 796 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 3,042
Write 1608
Mixed 1,060
SusWrite 794
358% 1,626 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 46.2
158% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 795
DQ Write 658
DQ Mixed 716
539% 723 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 251%
Great: 372%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 76.D305G.D190B 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.2% Excellent
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 26.2
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 25
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G701VO Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

System: Asus G701VO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback