Toshiba SATELLITE C870-123

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C870-123  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory1.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120329
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateJul 09 '23 at 20:50
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2350M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Memory 82.9
1-Core 49.7
2-Core 75.6
47% 69.4 Pts
4-Core 116
8-Core 126
16% 121 Pts
64-Core 125
8% 125 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500/7600
Toshiba(1179 FB41) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
2.54% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 3
3% 3.2 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 3.1
2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.54%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 512GB SSD 512GB
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HCS2705D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 220 307 313 330 195 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 376
Write 309
Mixed 233
SusWrite 259
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 6.2
43% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 93.1
DQ Mixed 12.6
38% 82.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 235%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
36% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 11.6
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.6
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback