Asrock A88M-G/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A88M-G/3.1  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '23 at 12:18
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 50.8
1-Core 58.3
2-Core 113
43% 74 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 165
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.35% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.07 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.35%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X2001T 1TB
332GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0707B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 310 171 46 138 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 438
Write 356
Mixed 342
SusWrite 165
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 24
100% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 45.4
71% 134 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 105%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 99 97 99 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 95.4
Write 91.3
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 98.2
55% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
203% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2133C10-4GSR F3-2133C9-4GXL F3-2133C10-4GSR F3-2133C9-4GXL 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
30.2% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 12.6
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88M-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock A88M-G/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback