HP Pavilion All-in-One Desktop 32-b0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion All-in-One Desktop 32-b0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 892C
Memory5.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220223
Uptime7.3 Days
Run DateJul 09 '23 at 07:31
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 161
2-Core 221
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 662
70% 562 Pts
64-Core 1,050
65% 1,050 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
HP(103C 892C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3640
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.5% Average
Lighting 61.8
Reflection 87.3
Parallax 50.6
50% 66.6 fps
MRender 69.7
Gravity 52.9
Splatting 55
48% 59.2 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00BH1 1TB
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1NFAV Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 100 217 111 188 195 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 994
Write 500
Mixed 136
SusWrite 176
98% 451 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 43.4
154% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 836
DQ Write 79.6
DQ Mixed 130
178% 349 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 119%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43EB1-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
41.7% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 13.5
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 11.4
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion All-in-One Desktop 32-b0xxx Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion All-in-One Desktop 32-b0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback