Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140403
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '23 at 09:57
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Memory 79.6 1-Core 67 2-Core 115 55% 87.2 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 329 35% 279 Pts	64-Core 365 23% 365 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI FirePro V5800 (FireGL) Graphics Adapter 675 User benchmarks, average bench 9% HP(103C 2306) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	8.64% Terrible	Lighting 11.6 Reflection 11.1 Parallax 10.5 10% 11.1 fps	MRender 9.1 Gravity 9.3 Splatting 7.8 7% 8.73 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.64% Great: 10%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LMT-64M6M mSATA 64GB 230 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: DM6110C Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 366 Write 154 Mixed 190 52% 236 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 31.4 4K Mixed 20 71% 23.4 MB/s	DQ Read 248 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 147 125% 185 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 74%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 8GB 1,838 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 3GB free, PID 557d Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 31.3 Write 5.7 Mixed 7.7 14% 14.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 2.1 128% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5773CH0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5773CH0-CK0 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.9% Average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 15.2 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 12.8 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 81.2 49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 756 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	381x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	102x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	83x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	30x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	27x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	43x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $729

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16