TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Precision Tower 3620

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision Tower 3620
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 3620  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230405
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '23 at 01:38
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 218
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 487
53% 418 Pts
64-Core 564
35% 564 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑
This bench: 73.4%
 Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.93
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.3% Below average
Lighting 38.6
Reflection 41.2
Parallax 36.7
32% 38.8 fps
MRender 50
Gravity 36.6
Splatting 39.1
34% 41.9 fps
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 32.3%
 Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM871 2.5 7mm 256GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMM02D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 377 377 383 364 385 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 366
Mixed 301
SusWrite 371
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 35.3
117% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 317
239% 321 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 91.5%
 Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 197 192 194 192 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 153
Mixed 70.4
SusWrite 194
111% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 111%
 Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA82GU7MFR8N-TF 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
73.6% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 23.2
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 22.8
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 73.6%
 Great: 78%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Precision Tower 3620 Builds (Compare 3,313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 3620

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel  $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples854x
Core i7-7700Intel  $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples537x
Core i7-7700KIntel  $249Bench 84%, 712,312 samples270x
GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples331x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples249x
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples208x
SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba  $33Bench 145%, 33,719 samples102x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba  $50Bench 125%, 44,050 samples64x
THNSN5512GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshibaBench 122%, 19,561 samples59x
RAM
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBUnknownBench 72%, 2,345 samples209x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBUnknownBench 73%, 3,256 samples177x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 4x8GBUnknownBench 72%, 714 samples128x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback