Monster TULPAR T5 V23.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T5 V23.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T5 V23.1
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '23 at 18:42
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500HX
U29, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 75.7
1-Core 189
2-Core 370
110% 212 Pts
4-Core 738
8-Core 1,276
122% 1,007 Pts
64-Core 2,099
130% 2,099 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 A650) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2754
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 185
Reflection 205
Parallax 139
151% 176 fps
MRender 214
Gravity 116
Splatting 94.4
110% 142 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 130%
Great: 129%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU-00B07 512GB
393GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC7002Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1697 1892 1909 1830 848 256 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 1,646
Write 1,558
Mixed 1,324
SusWrite 1,405
334% 1,483 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 91.7
4K Mixed 58.9
193% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,509
DQ Write 1,123
DQ Mixed 1,132
896% 1,255 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 270%
Great: 351%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 56.4
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 44.5
137% 47.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 45
SC Mixed 25.5
86% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 126%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T5 V23.1 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V23.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback