HP Laptop 15q-bu0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive84.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Laptop 15q-bu0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 832A
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '23 at 17:31
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 71.2
1-Core 77.2
2-Core 142
57% 96.7 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 208
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 832A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7156
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.47% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 6.6
5% 5.67 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 9.7
7% 7.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.47%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$40
333GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 331 342 363 383 337 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 349
Write 412
Mixed 363
SusWrite 338
83% 366 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 35.2
114% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 153
158% 258 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
622GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 95 96 99 100 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 88.1
Write 88.3
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 96.2
59% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 859B CB8GS2666.C8ET 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.2% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 19.8
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 19.3
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 98.7
40% 98.7 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15q-bu0xx Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15q-bu0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback