Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N4200 10,928 User benchmarks, average bench 30% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	29.8% Poor	Memory 36.5 1-Core 43.1 2-Core 85.8 32% 55.1 Pts	4-Core 133 8-Core 140 18% 137 Pts	64-Core 141 9% 141 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505 2,850 User benchmarks, average bench 2% ASRock(1849 5A84) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	1.58% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 2.1 1% 1.73 fps	MRender 2.5 Gravity 5.3 Splatting 0.2 2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.58% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GMSA452T2 128GB 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02J0T4GB SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 125 161 130 133 131 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	67.8% Good	Read 421 Write 399 Mixed 383 SusWrite 136 75% 335 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 46.7 4K Mixed 34 113% 36.7 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 140 112% 158 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF1866C11S3L/8G 1x8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 7.9 23% 8.17 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 3.2 10% 3.43 GB/s	Latency 219 18% 219 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N4200IntelBench 30%, 10,928 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	2x

SSD
TS64GSSD452K2 64GBTranscendBench 43%, 2 samples	1x
TS128GMSA452T2 128GBTranscendBench 68%, 1 sample	1x

RAM
KF1866C11S3L/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 21%, 8 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16