Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Google Compute Engine (all builds)
Motherboard	Google Google Compute Engine
Memory	6.5 GB free of 128 GB
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20230527
Uptime	13.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '23 at 15:48
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	56%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon 462 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	Memory 14.7 1-Core 56.4 2-Core 116 31% 62.3 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 278 30% 237 Pts	64-Core 389 24% 389 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 68%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Google PersistentDisk 86GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 77 80 82 87 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 87%
Google PersistentDisk 54GB 490 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 46GB free Firmware: 1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 77 81 83 88 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	Read 247 Write 112 Mixed 144 SusWrite 80.3 108% 146 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 3.3 548% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 83%
Google PersistentDisk 11GB 9GB free Firmware: 1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 78 81 83 89 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Google PersistentDisk 537GB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 434GB free Firmware: 1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 66 67 69 70 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 129 Write 84 Mixed 129 SusWrite 67.5 77% 102 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 2.6 484% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x16GB 2,632 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	60.4% Good	MC Read 23.4 MC Write 32.9 MC Mixed 21.9 74% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 0.4 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 0.6 5% 1.87 GB/s	Latency 362 11% 362 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 142%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 40%

Speed boat

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 35%

Jet ski

SSD
PersistentDisk 1TBGoogleBench 44%, 5 samples	1x
nvme_card-pd 537GBBench 45%, 4 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16