Asus K52Jc

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago.

System	Asus K52Jc (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K52Jc
Memory	2.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20110125
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '23 at 13:16
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	41%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 350-$199 14,351 User benchmarks, average bench 38% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	24.4% Poor	Memory 31.9 1-Core 36.1 2-Core 72 27% 46.7 Pts	4-Core 99.1 8-Core 94.7 13% 96.9 Pts	64-Core 100 6% 100 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310M 8,303 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1432) 1GB Driver: Ver. 21.21.13.4201 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.27% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.3 1% 0.8 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 3.2 2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.27% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 95 158 171 168 185 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.6% Below average	Read 220 Write 182 Mixed 200 SusWrite 156 43% 189 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 9.1 4K Mixed 12 50% 13.5 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 29 DQ Mixed 49.5 48% 81 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 128%
Kingston A400 120GB-$26 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 59GB free Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 65 47 42 49 41 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.3% Poor	Read 166 Write 91.8 Mixed 101 SusWrite 65.6 24% 106 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 9.2 4K Mixed 7.7 32% 9.33 MB/s	DQ Read 159 DQ Write 27.9 DQ Mixed 47.5 47% 78.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5273DH0-CH9 02FE EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 6GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 8 20% 7 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 244 16% 244 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 27%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K52Jc Builds (Compare 145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus K52Jc

CPU
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	45x
Core i5 M 450IntelBench 40%, 8,084 samples	21x
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	19x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	115x
GeForce 310MNvidiaBench 1%, 8,303 samples	30x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	17x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x

RAM
ASU1333D3S9DR8/2G 2x2GBKingstonBench 27%, 948 samples	14x
SSZ3128M8-EAEEF 2x2GBAsintBench 24%, 277 samples	10x
AD73I1B1672EG 2x2GBAdataBench 25%, 997 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $156

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16