Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME B560M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B560M-K  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '23 at 09:44
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500E
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 83.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 239
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 729
72% 587 Pts
64-Core 958
59% 958 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
MSI(1462 C757) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 112
Parallax 126
99% 120 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 114
Splatting 104
105% 132 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00-1006 1TB
334GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1402 973 835 798 893 856 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1,949
Write 1,920
Mixed 1609
SusWrite 960
361% 1,609 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 60.6
202% 72.8 MB/s
DQ Read 949
DQ Write 675
DQ Mixed 816
608% 813 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 235%
Great: 317%
JAJS600M256C 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 440 444 446 443 448 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 420
Mixed 394
SusWrite 444
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 18.5
116% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 27
78% 162 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 91%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
903GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 186 185 186 186 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 144
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 186
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Hitachi HDS723020BLE640 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OAAB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 120 122 124 117 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 105
Write 110
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 120
66% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
43.3% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 12.5
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 14.2
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B560M-K Builds (Compare 2,703 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B560M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $456
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback