Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 330 14,119 User benchmarks, average bench 38% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	Memory 41.6 1-Core 50.9 2-Core 85.2 35% 59.2 Pts	4-Core 111 8-Core 113 15% 112 Pts	64-Core 112 7% 112 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4300 2,791 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Dell(1028 0434) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.79% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 2.4 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.33 fps	MRender 1.3 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.6 1% 0.73 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.79% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE500000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 49 7.4 24 7.3 70 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.9% Poor	Read 206 Write 167 Mixed 138 SusWrite 50.4 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 13.9 4K Mixed 7.2 35% 11.1 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 31.8 DQ Mixed 34.8 36% 60 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16JSF25664HZ-1G1F1 80AD HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 4GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1067, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	21.8% Poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 9.2 22% 7.73 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 5.9 17% 5.87 GB/s	Latency 195 20% 195 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 2,791 samples	68x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	67x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	17x

RAM
HMT125S6BFR8C-G7 2x2GBHynixBench 24%, 1,873 samples	13x
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples	11x
EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F 2x2GBUnknownBench 23%, 1,093 samples	8x

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $38

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16