HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AE8h
Memory20.6 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111102
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 06 '23 at 21:45
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5540
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 68.3
2-Core 132
57% 93.5 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 244
32% 240 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
PNY(196E 109A) 2GB
CLim: 993 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.44
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
6.86% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 9.6
6% 8.63 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 10.9
Splatting 9
8% 9.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.86%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK512MBF-1AN1ZABHA 512GB
240GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 217 214 226 230 231 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.4% Good
Read 230
Write 238
Mixed 218
SusWrite 221
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 28.6
92% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 169
135% 188 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 96 93 94 91 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 145
Write 154
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 92.9
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$22
319GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 83 87 86 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 110
Write 110
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 85.7
67% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M391B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273CH0-CH9 58GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.7% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 14.4
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback