Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E546

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK E546  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB291
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '23 at 17:36
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
30% Below average
Memory 35
1-Core 59.1
2-Core 110
38% 68.1 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 143
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Fujitsu(10CF 18D1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4639
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
4.87% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 5.3
4% 4.9 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 8.9
6% 6.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.87%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: K8FA4102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 201 223 200 216 217 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.4% Average
Read 277
Write 200
Mixed 186
SusWrite 209
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 19.6
4K Mixed 13.7
45% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 131
115% 173 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
31.2% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 11.3
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 227
18% 227 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK E546 Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E546

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback