Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	65.1% Good	Memory 70.7 1-Core 75.4 2-Core 187 62% 111 Pts	4-Core 343 8-Core 356 46% 350 Pts	64-Core 361 22% 361 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.41 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	22.3% Poor	Lighting 30.8 Reflection 25 Parallax 25.8 25% 27.2 fps	MRender 35 Gravity 35.2 Splatting 0.2 17% 23.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB-$94 19,345 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 363GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41100WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 299 308 302 299 298 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Read 441 Write 353 Mixed 235 SusWrite 304 75% 333 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 41.8 4K Mixed 27.9 86% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 345 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 218 190% 284 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-043.A00G 1x8GB 990 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.2% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 7.6 24% 8.57 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 6.6 17% 6 GB/s	Latency 99.9 40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	6x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	5x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x

SSD
S700 500GBHP $60Bench 71%, 12,813 samples	4x
Blue 500GBWD $94Bench 86%, 19,345 samples	1x

RAM
99U5701-049.A00G 2x16GBKingstonBench 76%, 99 samples	4x
M378A1K43BB1-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,085 samples	1x
9905678-043.A00G 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 990 samples	1x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $139