PC Cypher GT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPC Cypher GT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B460-PLUS
Memory20.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210407
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 06 '23 at 12:59
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$95
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 83.6
1-Core 119
2-Core 202
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 721
73% 591 Pts
64-Core 898
56% 898 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.40
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.7% Average
Lighting 57.5
Reflection 71.9
Parallax 55.9
47% 61.8 fps
MRender 83.4
Gravity 52.4
Splatting 58.8
52% 64.9 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
512gb PCS PCIe M.2 SSD 512GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1106A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,987
Write 1,506
Mixed 1,145
342% 1,546 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 26.9
171% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 893
DQ Write 681
DQ Mixed 647
522% 741 MB/s
Poor: 110% Great: 255%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
222GB free
Firmware: CC46
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 18,645
Mixed 73
6,689% 9,359 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CM4X8GF2400Z16K4 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CM4X8GF2400Z16K4 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
74.5% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 23.7
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 22.2
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Cypher GT Builds (Compare 116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

System: PC Cypher GT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback