ECS H81H3-M3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardECS H81H3-M3  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '23 at 11:40
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
53.1% Above average
Memory 72.3
1-Core 86.5
2-Core 146
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 204
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Elitegroup(1019 7EAD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.93% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 6.1
3% 3.97 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.1
3% 4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.93%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CTSSD256S6 256GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1104J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 215 229 261 267 275 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 462
Write 281
Mixed 297
SusWrite 244
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 13.4
108% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 16.2
48% 102 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 14.5
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 96.2
42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81H3-M3 Builds (Compare 363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H81H3-M3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback