Today's hottest deals

HP 700-327c

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics160% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP 700-327c  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3151 x 1662 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140205
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 06 '23 at 02:29
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 514
52% 419 Pts
64-Core 519
32% 519 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$440
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
160% Outstanding
Lighting 238
Reflection 276
Parallax 207
194% 240 fps
MRender 245
Gravity 156
Splatting 127
138% 176 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 160%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JAJS600M2TB 2TB
216GB free
Firmware: VE0R631D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 280 279 290 291 287 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 420
Write 346
Mixed 295
SusWrite 277
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 59.7
4K Mixed 19
83% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 79
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 126
113% 164 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 101%
JAJS600M2TB 2TB
422GB free
Firmware: U0128A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 298 299 310 312 305 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 431
Write 379
Mixed 334
SusWrite 307
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 24.7
101% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 48
86% 163 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 101%
JAJS600M2TB 2TB
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0128A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 287 296 309 309 271 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 216
Write 273
Mixed 224
SusWrite 297
57% 253 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 73.1
4K Mixed 24.4
107% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 45.9
80% 149 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 101%
JAJS600M2TB 2TB
557GB free
Firmware: VE0R631D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 279 277 278 277 270 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 428
Write 336
Mixed 302
SusWrite 273
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 19.2
84% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 75.2
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 127
113% 163 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
54.7% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 16.3
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-327c Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP 700-327c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback