Dell PowerEdge R740

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell PowerEdge R740
MotherboardDell PowerEdge R740  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '23 at 10:56
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon (Skylake, IBRS)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 45.5
1-Core 60.9
2-Core 132
44% 79.6 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 436
45% 365 Pts
64-Core 441
27% 441 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 535.98
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
7.21% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 9.8
7% 9.17 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 8.8
Splatting 7.1
8% 10.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 7.21%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 161GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 5.7 39 40 39 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 78%
Red Hat VirtIO 2.5TB
222GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 77 54 56 53 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Red Hat VirtIO 21TB
261GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 38 29 28 33 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x12GB
1 of 1 slots used
12GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 28
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 7.1
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 63%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback