Acer Veriton M6610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Veriton M6610  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M6610
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '23 at 10:05
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400S-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 84.1
1-Core 73.3
2-Core 137
60% 98.1 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 227
28% 215 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
Nvidia(10DE 0825) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
3.94% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 5
4% 5.67 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 5
Splatting 3.8
4% 5.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.94%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37/120GB 120GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1211A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 86 62 42 42 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 427
Write 341
Mixed 283
SusWrite 70
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 0.9
69% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 84
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 1.2
58% 132 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SKIHOTAR-4GB-1600 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.8% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.03 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M6610 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M6610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback