Fujitsu CELSIUS H970

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics39.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS H970  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNBB57
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171116
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJul 05 '23 at 07:40
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HQ
Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Memory 30.8
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 179
51% 99.8 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 271
36% 270 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P3000
Fujitsu(10CF 1972) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3625
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.9% Below average
Lighting 48.3
Reflection 46.7
Parallax 45.4
39% 46.8 fps
MRender 56.9
Gravity 45.8
Splatting 48.3
41% 50.3 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 42%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk X400 M.2 2280 512GB
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4152012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 277 284 271 278 288 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 296
Write 271
Mixed 162
SusWrite 277
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 15.2
4K Mixed 9.7
38% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 184
159% 237 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 97%
Seagate Game Drive Xbox 8TB
78GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 18 18 19 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 250
16% 250 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS H970 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS H970

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback