Positivo POS-PIH81DI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo POS-PIH81DI  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-PIH81DI
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '23 at 00:24
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Memory 1.02
1-Core 84.6
2-Core 166
38% 83.9 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 229
29% 221 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Device(1B0A 0172) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.49% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 3.9
2% 2.73 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.5
3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.49%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253LE120G 120GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 67 46 84 47 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.2% Below average
Read 149
Write 139
Mixed 171
SusWrite 58.8
29% 129 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 19.5
77% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 70.7
DQ Mixed 13.4
38% 83.3 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SH564128FH8N6TNFQG 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
13.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 4.1
12% 4.37 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 496
8% 496 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical POS-PIH81DI Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-PIH81DI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $107
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback