HP Z440 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemHP Z440 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 212B
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '23 at 23:05
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 64
2-Core 129
57% 92.5 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 516
46% 387 Pts
64-Core 1,530
95% 1,530 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000
Nvidia(10DE 1190) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.25
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Lighting 25.7
Reflection 29.7
Parallax 26.9
21% 27.4 fps
MRender 24.3
Gravity 27.4
Splatting 28
22% 26.6 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC3000S1024G 1TB
907GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1937 1940 1944 1937 1923 1928 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 1,776
Write 2,085
Mixed 1,920
SusWrite 1935
436% 1,929 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 50.8
160% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 517
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 454
327% 426 MB/s
Poor: 239%
This bench: 258%
Great: 591%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G43EB1-CRC M393A1K43BB0-CRC M393A1K43BB0-CRC M393A1G43EB1-CRC 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
116% Outstanding
MC Read 56.7
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 41.9
134% 47 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 15.6
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 116%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z440 Workstation Builds (Compare 6,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Z440 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback