HP Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8207
Memory2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '23 at 22:00
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Memory 36.5
1-Core 52.6
2-Core 91.9
34% 60.3 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 142
18% 137 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 8207) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
4.92% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 5.6
4% 5 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 8.8
6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.92%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
808GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX1R2C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 75.9
Write 68.6
Mixed 25.2
41% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB
32GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 301
Write 58.7
Mixed 84.1
143% 148 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 2.5
675% 8.67 MB/s
DQ Read 12.9
DQ Write 26.2
DQ Mixed 3.2
1,048% 14.1 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143DB0-CPB Hynix HMA425S6AFR6N-TF 6GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
32.2% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 11.2
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 219
18% 219 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,863 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback