Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3050 14,457 User benchmarks, average bench 19% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	Memory 41.7 1-Core 19.3 2-Core 35.4 22% 32.1 Pts	4-Core 35.9 8-Core 36.2 5% 36.1 Pts	64-Core 35.8 2% 35.8 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1BAD) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5107 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.31% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 2.2 1% 1.5 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 2.3 2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.31% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Drevo X1 SSD 120GB 1,961 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0327B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 86 38 50 50 51 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	37.7% Below average	Read 440 Write 351 Mixed 308 SusWrite 95.8 67% 299 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 21.8 4K Mixed 0.9 42% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 79.7 DQ Write 57.9 DQ Mixed 27.9 32% 55.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SKIHOTAR-8GB-1600 1x8GB 90 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.7% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.33 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 2.9 9% 3.03 GB/s	Latency 194 21% 194 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 22%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	14x
Pentium N3700IntelBench 26%, 11,299 samples	2x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	16x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	4x
99U5428-018.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 26%, 6,120 samples	4x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16