Medion P17613

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemMedion P17613  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION NH70RAQM1
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '23 at 13:06
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 67.9
1-Core 106
2-Core 166
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 370
42% 331 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1E39 A010) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7324
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.91% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 52.7
Parallax 2.4
2% 19 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.4
2% 2.97 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 1.91%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow KC400 512GB-$180
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 324 400 402 470 472 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 492
Write 477
Mixed 320
SusWrite 394
94% 421 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 51.4
4K Mixed 31.4
104% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 65.1
107% 205 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.2% Below average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 9.8
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 5.3
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P17613 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Medion P17613

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback