Onda ONDA F85U Ver:1.04

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics74.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardOnda ONDA F85U Ver:1.04  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130111
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 04 '23 at 10:13
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 740K
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37% Below average
Memory 54.4
1-Core 38.6
2-Core 85.5
37% 59.5 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 108
15% 112 Pts
64-Core 121
8% 121 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.4.2
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.8% Very good
Lighting 68.6
Reflection 48.1
Parallax 153
56% 90 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 85.5
Splatting 148
111% 136 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 232 254 223 300 322 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 319
Write 296
Mixed 263
SusWrite 255
64% 283 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 29.3
97% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 32.4
DQ Write 81.5
DQ Mixed 41.8
36% 51.9 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 137%
Plextor PX-1TM9PeGN 1TB
480GB free
Firmware: 1.07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 524 495 528 596 742 699 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 996
Write 1,055
Mixed 762
SusWrite 597
192% 853 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 40.8
136% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 190
147% 204 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 128%
Great: 263%
WD Elements SE SSD 1TB
159GB free
Firmware: 6002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 77 116 83 56 47 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.4% Poor
Read 266
Write 205
Mixed 205
SusWrite 88.2
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 7.3
33% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 29
DQ Write 39.1
DQ Mixed 16.9
18% 28.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 52740 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 5.9
17% 6 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 7
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ONDA F85U Ver:1.04 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Onda ONDA F85U Ver:1.04

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback