Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '23 at 14:20
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 75.5
1-Core 49.4
2-Core 99.7
48% 74.9 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 226
26% 201 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.8% Below average
Lighting 41.2
Reflection 45.6
Parallax 41.2
34% 42.7 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 41.6
Splatting 36.8
31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$99
224GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 353 401 387 424 379 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 435
Mixed 428
SusWrite 378
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 46.4
144% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 186
148% 210 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 137%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
402GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 173 175 176 176 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 129
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 172
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 113%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
43GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 117 120 117 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 115
Write 19.3
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 116
59% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
188% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
223GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 156 158 174 128 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 160
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 148
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.8% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 7.4
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6.9
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback