QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics68.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '23 at 12:58
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core (Broadwell, IBRS)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 67.1
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 146
56% 95.8 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 609
51% 443 Pts
64-Core 994
62% 994 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.5% Good
Lighting 84.2
Reflection 86.4
Parallax 81.9
69% 84.2 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 77.4
Splatting 69.3
68% 86 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 550GB
438GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 687 359 507 746 302 723 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
129% Outstanding
MC Read 57.3
MC Write 53.6
MC Mixed 49.2
152% 53.4 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 15.2
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 129%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 127% - Outstanding Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback