| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 5.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Samsung 700Z3C/700Z5C (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG NP700Z5C-S02UB |
| Memory | 8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20131104 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 03 '23 at 03:02 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3635QM
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
60%
Above average
|
63% 105 Pts
|
34% 268 Pts
|
20% 330 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 640M
Sanyo(144D C0D5) 1GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
|
5.32%
Terrible
|
5% 6.77 fps
|
6% 8.03 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 422 434 469 468 471 MB/s
|
102%
Outstanding
|
101% 448 MB/s
|
124% 43.4 MB/s
|
237% 339 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F 859B CT102464BF160B.C16 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
29.3%
Poor
|
27% 9.3 GB/s
|
28% 9.9 GB/s
|
49% 82.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 700Z3C/700Z5C Builds (Compare 161 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 700Z3C/700Z5C
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3635QMIntelBench 62%, 2,986 samples | 70x |
| Core i7-3615QMIntelBench 62%, 2,657 samples | 67x |
| Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples | 24x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 129x |
| GeForce GT 640MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,728 samples | 25x |
| GeForce GT 630MNvidiaBench 3%, 7,774 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |