Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	28.8% Poor	Memory 38.2 1-Core 47 2-Core 75.9 32% 53.7 Pts	4-Core 113 8-Core 111 15% 112 Pts	64-Core 110 7% 110 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.62% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 2.1 2% 2.07 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 2.4 2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.62% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Teclast BD256GB SLCB-2242 256GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 117GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN06201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 323 322 331 359 402 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Read 357 Write 347 Mixed 312 SusWrite 346 77% 341 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 51 4K Mixed 28.4 98% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 180 136% 183 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.3% Poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 8.6 23% 8.13 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.3 GB/s	Latency 211 19% 211 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	38x
Celeron N4000IntelBench 24%, 14,024 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	39x

SSD
256GB NS550-2242 256GBTeclastBench 54%, 255 samples	20x
128GB NS550-2242 128GBTeclastBench 45%, 331 samples	5x
BD256GB SLCB-2242 256GBTeclastBench 70%, 5 samples	5x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	28x
123456789012345678 2x2GBABCDBench 19%, 5,404 samples	11x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16