Asus Zenbook UP6502ZD_Q539ZD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive367% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Zenbook UP6502ZD_Q539ZD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UP6502ZD
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220908
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 02 '23 at 17:44
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 61.7
1-Core 164
2-Core 306
92% 177 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 816
85% 681 Pts
64-Core 1,360
84% 1,360 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$449
Nvidia(10DE 14B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 161
Parallax 156
130% 159 fps
MRender 162
Gravity 151
Splatting 124
117% 145 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 121%
Great: 170%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD Blue SN570 2TB
697GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2095 2148 2220 2459 2472 1434 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
367% Outstanding
Read 2,390
Write 2,057
Mixed 1,876
SusWrite 2,138
476% 2,115 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 69.9
273% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,388
DQ Write 1,194
DQ Mixed 1,297
970% 1,293 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 367%
Great: 462%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB@BM-MGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
131% Outstanding
MC Read 58.1
MC Write 47.2
MC Mixed 47.7
146% 51 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 42.1
SC Mixed 24.1
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 131%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Zenbook UP6502ZD_Q539ZD Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Asus Zenbook UP6502ZD_Q539ZD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback