MSI H310M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7C13)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C13
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7C13)  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '23 at 17:21
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 121
2-Core 223
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 421
54% 406 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.57% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 4.4
4% 4.3 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.57%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 120GB-$45
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1230C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 502
Write 418
Mixed 367
95% 429 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 40.3
136% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 240
195% 274 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 91%
Apacer AS340 480GB
368GB free
Firmware: APLA5PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 364 236 110 90 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 479
Write 327
Mixed 328
SusWrite 210
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 38.4
146% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 195
168% 243 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.CAGP7.40C0B 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2000 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
36.5% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 10.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7C13) Builds (Compare 881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7C13)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback