Asus ASUSLaptop_Q530VJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemAsus ASUSLaptop_Q530VJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K6502VJQ
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '23 at 12:37
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13620H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 74.8
1-Core 195
2-Core 391
114% 220 Pts
4-Core 751
8-Core 1,148
118% 950 Pts
64-Core 1,630
101% 1,630 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
Asus(1043 32C8) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2897
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.9% Above average
Lighting 78
Reflection 72.8
Parallax 71.9
64% 74.2 fps
MRender 50.9
Gravity 62.7
Splatting 57.3
47% 57 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA003 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 702 76 78 77 79 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,405
Write 1,546
Mixed 1,210
SusWrite 182
243% 1,086 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 37.2
208% 79.2 MB/s
DQ Read 934
DQ Write 477
DQ Mixed 762
551% 725 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 160%
Great: 234%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL Micron MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 16GB
4800, 4800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
139% Outstanding
MC Read 60.7
MC Write 50.3
MC Mixed 50.1
153% 53.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 47.5
SC Mixed 25.9
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 107%
This bench: 139%
Great: 141%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUSLaptop_Q530VJ Builds (Compare 122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUSLaptop_Q530VJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback