HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory8 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '23 at 08:02
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5650
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 140
59% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 398
44% 344 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8544) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.3% Below average
Lighting 38.3
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 36.2
31% 38.4 fps
MRender 36.3
Gravity 36.1
Splatting 32.5
28% 35 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC300 2 256GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0P00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 345 316 358 357 330 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 390
Write 370
Mixed 310
SusWrite 339
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 27.7
90% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 194
153% 212 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-YH9 ID:80 AD HMT351R7BFR8A-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351R7BFR8A-H9 46GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.7% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 19.6
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 10.8
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback