Supermicro C7Z97-OCE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro C7Z97-OCE  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro C7Z97-OCE
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140402
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 01 '23 at 19:11
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 80
1-Core 105
2-Core 200
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 499
50% 407 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Lighting 67.7
Reflection 65.4
Parallax 90.3
55% 74.5 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 76.5
Splatting 48.8
51% 63.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 421 422 459 414 384 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 446
Mixed 389
SusWrite 407
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 43.7
144% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 211
168% 230 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 100%
Great: 125%
WD WD5003ABYZ-011FA0 500GB
374GB free
Firmware: 01.01S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 121 122 122 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 142
Write 129
Mixed 116
SusWrite 121
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
223% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965472-026.A00LF 9965472-021.A00LF 9965472-026.A00LF 9965472-021.A00LF 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.3% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 16.4
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 19.4
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C7Z97-OCE Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Supermicro C7Z97-OCE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $151
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback