Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 01 '23 at 17:04
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$30
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 110
2-Core 218
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 336
42% 319 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
MSI(1462 C757) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 111
Parallax 142
101% 126 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 112
Splatting 103
105% 133 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 186 54 50 47 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 458
Write 443
Mixed 323
SusWrite 104
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 38
117% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 224
190% 280 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 126%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 80GB
23GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 25 18 18 24 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 176
Write 95.9
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 22.5
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 64%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 456GB
79GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 24 19 22 23 42 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 166
Write 123
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 24.6
72% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
194% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 69%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
348GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 41 20 39 27 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 194
Write 154
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 27
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 64GB
7GB free
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 97.8
Write 163
Mixed 75.1
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 62%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 172GB
21GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 27 23 20 26 22 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 163
Write 72.2
Mixed 74.6
SusWrite 25.7
62% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
168% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 59%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 86GB
22GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 26 23 20 26 21 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
41% Average
Read 120
Write 85.7
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 22.1
51% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.1% Good
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 18.9
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.4
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,661 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback