Gigabyte GA-G5 KC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G5 KC  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210120
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJul 01 '23 at 04:19
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 84.7
1-Core 123
2-Core 242
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 728
73% 596 Pts
64-Core 676
42% 676 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 50F3) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3640
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 101
Reflection 114
Parallax 110
82% 108 fps
Gravity 85.5
Splatting 73.6
70% 79.6 fps
Poor: 67% Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SX8200PNP-512GT- 512GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SANA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 811 455 339 548 411 197 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,993
Write 1,011
Mixed 617
SusWrite 460
224% 1,020 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 44.1
156% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 456
DQ Mixed 122
168% 303 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 174%
Great: 290%
WDC WD20 02FAEX-007BA0 2TB
54GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 75 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 74.2
Write 73.8
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 74.7
97% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
113% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.9% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 19
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 20.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G5 KC Builds (Compare 1,640 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G5 KC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback