HP EliteDesk 800 G4 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G4 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83E1
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230328
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 01 '23 at 04:05
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$139
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 242
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 582
69% 532 Pts
64-Core 603
37% 603 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1200
Nvidia(10DE 1140) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 462.96
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 15.4
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 14.3
13% 14.8 fps
MRender 19.8
Gravity 16.4
Splatting 13.4
13% 16.5 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 1TB
856GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0609B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 398 390 425 426 429 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 451
Write 354
Mixed 357
SusWrite 408
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 21
104% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 46.3
86% 165 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 103%
Toshiba MG04ACA400E 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: FP3B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 186 183 189 182 182 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 137
Write 161
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 184
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9S8ME-8 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
91% Outstanding
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 29
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 37.8
SC Mixed 26.9
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 91%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G4 SFF Builds (Compare 806 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G4 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback