Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	55.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

11 months ago, 11 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Memory 51.8 1-Core 20.9 2-Core 147 39% 73.1 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 237 32% 238 Pts	64-Core 337 21% 337 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 80%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 2.5 480GB 1,203 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: 42048100 SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 334 152 150 160 99 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Read 336 Write 289 Mixed 306 SusWrite 198 63% 282 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 35.2 4K Mixed 20.1 72% 24.5 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 57.9 74% 135 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S1ME-4 85F7 J641GU42J9266ND 12GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	41.9% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 14 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 10.6 SC Mixed 9 26% 9.13 GB/s	Latency 154 26% 154 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2,909x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,512x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	687x

SSD
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	832x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples	255x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	196x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	603x
ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 42%, 19,360 samples	411x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	279x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16