Acer Aspire A515-44

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire A515-44  (all builds)
MotherboardRO Calla_RN
Memory15.3 GB free of 20 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210315
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJun 30 '23 at 17:16
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 132
2-Core 264
84% 157 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 544
64% 498 Pts
64-Core 539
33% 539 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Acer(1025 1461) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.40.40
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
7.28% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 19.9
5% 13.8 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 15.3
Splatting 16.8
12% 13.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.28%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GB
297GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 765 827 288 140 57 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 1,302
Write 881
Mixed 824
SusWrite 358
187% 841 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 91.1
4K Mixed 55.7
188% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 734
DQ Mixed 219
256% 427 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 156%
Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FP Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 20GB
3200, 2667 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 18.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 15.7
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A515-44 Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A515-44

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback