Gigabyte GA-E7AUM-DS2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-E7AUM-DS2H  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '23 at 02:08
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9450-$110
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 73.8
1-Core 41.8
2-Core 78.6
43% 64.7 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 116
16% 116 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 36F7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.29% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 4.3
3% 4 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.29%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 512GB 512GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0728A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 83 189 69 57 6.7 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47% Average
Read 276
Write 228
Mixed 245
SusWrite 87.2
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 18.3
86% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 63.6
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 30.1
46% 83.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47%
Great: 211%
FNK TECH USB CARD READER 64GB
16GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 50.5
Write 14.9
Mixed 15
SusWrite 14.1
26% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
54% 4.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 4.6
15% 5.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 5.2
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 93
43% 93 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-E7AUM-DS2H Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-E7AUM-DS2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback