PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 25.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus X99-DELUXE (all builds) |
Memory | 23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170905 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 29 '23 at 16:39 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 15% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
73.7%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.7%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 432 72 17 18 20 MB/s
|
86%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$185
0GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 22 30 24 22 32 MB/s
|
||||
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$185
12GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 123 127 126 125 135 MB/s
|
77.6%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
105%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 839x |
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 462x |
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples | 283x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 148x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 142x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 123x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $705 |