Asus H81M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
24 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-K  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140513
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 29 '23 at 02:40
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
61% Good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 171
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 245
33% 245 Pts
64-Core 249
15% 249 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 61%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
PwrHis(1787 201C) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.6% Below average
Lighting 42.7
Reflection 31.4
Parallax 55.5
35% 43.2 fps
MRender 29.2
Gravity 44.3
Splatting 23
26% 32.2 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 541ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 112 105 102 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 95.1
Write 163
Mixed 148
SusWrite 104
29% 128 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 26.8
94% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 128
104% 148 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
715GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 152 154 155 156 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 144
Mixed 87.9
SusWrite 154
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 112%
Hitachi HDS72303 3TB
415GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 93 94 94 94 94 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.4% Average
Read 100
Write 103
Mixed 48.4
SusWrite 94
115% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
99% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Team-Elite-1600 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 17.5
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 15.7
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback