AZW SER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAZW SER  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW SER
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '23 at 01:11
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 62.5
1-Core 136
2-Core 268
82% 156 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 688
75% 596 Pts
64-Core 881
54% 881 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 23.20.00.39
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 25.9
14% 20.4 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 21
Splatting 19.5
15% 18.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0 512GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM01100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 32 77 32 576 143 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 1,689
Write 1,228
Mixed 1,135
SusWrite 170
234% 1,056 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 29.7
122% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 401
DQ Write 693
DQ Mixed 434
361% 509 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 139%
Great: 247%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
679GB free
Firmware: EB01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 132 130 131 132 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 75.5
Write 132
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 131
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.M8FR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.7% Good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 23.8
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 16.3
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SER Builds (Compare 789 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: AZW SER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback