Lenovo F0D7001AIN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo F0D7001AIN  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36ED
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180507
Uptime18.8 Days
Run DateJun 28 '23 at 07:56
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4005
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Memory 10.3
1-Core 36.1
2-Core 51.4
17% 32.6 Pts
4-Core 64.5
8-Core 60.7
8% 62.6 Pts
64-Core 63.5
4% 63.5 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Legend(17AA 36ED) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1371
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.7% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 1.9
2% 1.63 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2.9
2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.7%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
773GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 28 34 47 31 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 37.3
Write 60.4
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 33.3
28% 38.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0
47% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3270ME86H9F-26 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
8.51% Terrible
MC Read 2.2
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 2.7
9% 3 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 2
6% 2.1 GB/s
Latency 401
10% 401 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 8.51%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F0D7001AIN Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo F0D7001AIN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback